Oxonmoot 2024

The aim of this paper is to present a selection of theological Tolkien criticism for the purpose of evaluating them through practical theologian Leah Robinson’s definition of bad theology. I will argue that bad theology in Tolkien Studies needs to be identified and be replaced with the openness of theologian John Thatamanil’s criteria for embracing religious diversity and its utilization as an evaluative tool for future theological engagements within Tolkien Studies. I will conclude, that those who understand bad theology & begin with a positive treatment of theological diversity are better equipped to engage Tolkien Studies with higher levels of ethical inquiry and critical nuance. For the future of theology in Tolkien Studies to flourish, theologians must recognize the inherent relational complexity of their own traditions, Tolkien as theologically multifarious, and proceed with the aim of stoking diverse theological engagement through religious diversity.